Short Sale In Boulder Area and Northern Colorado

There are many ways homeowners can lose a home, but signing away ownership from foreclosure or bankruptcy can strip an owner of dignity and their nest egg. The option of a "short sale" or "discounted payoffs" may make more sense for the homeowner; however, there are some issues relating to these kinds of real estate transactions. The first issue, other than the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, the home owner should be aware the I.R.S. could consider such an act of debt forgiveness as income. There are no guarantees that a lender who accepts a "short sale" will not legally pursue a borrower for the difference between the amount owed and the amount paid. In a few states, the amount is known as a deficiency. The second issue is, even if the property does qualify, not all lenders will agree to do a short sale or discounted payoffs. S o when going though the varying requirements remember the following: When calling the lender do not speak with the "real estate short sale" or "work out" department(s); rather, get the supervisor's name, the name of the individual capable of making a decision. You will receive better cooperation if you prepare a "Letter of Authorization" to the lender (giving the lender permission to speak with third parties). The letter should include the following:
- Property Owners Name
- Property Address
- Loan Reference Number
- The Date- Agent's Name
- Agent's Contact InfoSome of the other documents needed to have a successful short sale are:
•Preliminary Net Sheet
•Hardship Letter
•Proof of Income and Assets
•Copies of Bank Statements
•Comparative Market Analysis
•Purchase Agreement & Listing Agreement

Now Is A Great Time to Buy in the Boulder Valley

I'm sure that you are aware that ConocoPhillips has purchased the former Storage Technology Corporation campus consisting of 1.7 million square feet of office space and sitting on 432 acres in Louisville Colorado. This absorption of office space and creation of new job growth will contribute to a continued surge in the commercial market that is already seeing a steep demand for both small and large office space. There have been several other significant transactions in Louisville, Broomfield and Westminster that all are having a positive effect on housing.

The Boulder Valley is often recognized for its contrary viewpoints and we seem to move differently than the rest of the state and nation with our business cycles too. Our local economy is moving upward while the nation faces a period of stagnant growth. Richard Wobbekind, director of the Leeds School of Business Research Division at CU Boulder, States that, "the Boulder County Leading Economic Indicator projects that the Boulder Valley economy will continue to edge forward in the second quarter 2008. It moved upward from 111,8 in the third quarter 2007 to 114.2 in the fourth quarter. This suggests that the local economy will experience continued growth during the upcoming quarter at a time that the nation is experiencing stagnant growth or recession.."

Recent data from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight show that housing prices in Boulder County have increased by 2.9 percent in the last year. I believe that one of the reason we are going counter to the national trend is that we saw a decrease in new home construction beginning back in 2006 in this area and that has meant that we do not have the bulging inventory that other parts of the country are experiencing. The County has one of the lowest per capita foreclosure rates in the state and the unemployment level remains well below the state rate. The recent economic developments in the area show that we continue to be an attractive place to work and live.

Boulder Outraged Over Proposed Size Limits

Dear Planning Board Members:

I am writing to express my concern with Agenda Item #5A on the April 3, 2008 Public Meeting: "Public hearing and recommendation to City Council on approaches to interim regulations that may provide additional limitations in single family zoning districts aimed to protect neighborhood character."

I am opposed to any interim regulations for a number of reasons. As an initial matter, I am concerned that this proposal has been placed on a fast track for approval with little to no input from the citizens of the City of Boulder. The economic impact of any interim regulations on Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is not addressed in any of the materials submitted for this agenda item. It is very difficult to find a home in Boulder and most affordable homes are in need of serious repair and upgrades. It is hard for me to understand why the City would consider this proposal at a time when the economy is not good.

I have lived in downtown Boulder for over 20 years. I purchased my home several years ago in order to be able to live close to work. My wife and I plan on raising a family in our home, but we will need to remodel the current 2 bedrooms and 1 small bath in order to do so. The current zoning and permit process is very expensive and limits what can be done. My property is zoned RMX-1 and I have spent a lot of time and effort figuring out what we can and can't afford to do. I am concerned that the FAR proposal will add considerable time and expense to our plans. If this proposal is passed, my wife and I may have to join the exodus to Louisville, Lafayette or Longmont in order to find a sufficient home to raise a family. That is counter to the City's expressed goals of encouraging families to live and work downtown and having children attend neighborhood schools. If you pass this ill-conceived FAR proposal it will impact many people economically and cause property values to decline.

My big question is WHY is this such an emergency? The City spent a considerable amount of money on a Community Survey in 2007 and released the results in January, 2008. The Survey results are available on the City's website. The Boulder Community Survey included several questions about "Pops and Scrapes" (the alleged basis for the emergent nature of this FAR proposal). The Survey concluded that: "[T]he expansion or replacement of existing homes with larger homes ("pops and scrapes") is an issue about which Boulderites are ambiguous." Report of Results (2008-01-02), p. 35. Interestingly, a substantial majority found that "pops and scrapes" were good for the community because they: update the housing; beautify neighborhoods and the community by replacing or renovating run-down housing; benefit the neighborhoods by increasing property values; are necessary to match the quality of the housing to the cost of the land on which the house sits; and benefit neighborhoods by increasing the variety in housing design. Report of Results (2008-01-02), p. 35, Figure 23. These results are also interesting because 52% of respondents were property owners in the City. Report of Results (2008-01-02), p. 73, Table 51.

I am asking that you NOT recommend any interim regulations that may provide additional limitations in single family zoning districts to the City Council. Please stop this rush to find a solution to a problem that has not even been identified with any clarity. There are some very serious concerns that most property owners have that are not, and have not been, addressed. The .35 FAR number appears to have been snatched out of the air. I could find no basis for how this was determined or why it should be used. Is it really appropriate to use a "one size fits all" approach? Why are you now trying to include additional zoning classifications when the issue was supposedly aimed at RL-1? At a minimum, before this goes any further, an economic impact statement should be ordered to determine what effect the FAR proposal will have on property values, mortgages, property taxes, the local economy and the business community (builders, suppliers, realtors, etc.). I hope that you are hearing from a lot of property owners on this issue. Everyone I have talked to is extremely upset with the proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to provide my input.

Sincerely,

Andrew and Kristin Macdonald
2003 Pine Street
Boulder, CO 80302

Showings Are Strong in Boulder for Condos Near Campus

I listed a 2 bedroom Boulder condominium last week in the Wimbledon complex at 30th and Colorado Avenue. The asking price is $182,900. I've had 7 showings in the first 4 days and a couple of the agents are coming back for 2nd showings. There are a few other similar condos on the market, but they are not nearly as nice as this one. Start with the granite countertops and stainless steel sinks in the kitchen and upstairs bathroom. This unit has 2 bedrooms on the 2nd floor with a full bathroom and a 1/2 bath on the main. This is another example of the Boulder real estate market behaving just the opposite of most markets nationally. Don't believe everything you hear from the media. MLS #162190 Listed by Gregg Ashburn of RE/MAX of Boulder, Inc. 303-875-4907 See this listing here!

More Research in Boulder County - Conoco Phillips Comes to Town

Horrified was first reaction by some hard core Boulderites to the announcement that Conoco Phillips bought the 432 acres in Louisville, once owned by Storage Tek. The truth is that this is going to be a educational facility as well as a hub for renewable energy research. The National Renewable Energy Laboratories is only miles away in Golden Colorado. The new jobs created will surely in the thousands. There will most likely be ongoing cooperative research with the University of Colorado and the School of Mines. It's not going to be another Commerce City as some of the bloggers in the area fear. I think we can look forward to a fantastic neighbor and a source of reliable employment for years to come. Of course this will be another reason to invest in Boulder County real estate. Our local market is stable. Provided by Gregg Ashburn "The Boulder Realtor for Boulder People" RE/MAX of Boulder, Inc. 2425 Canyon Blvd #110, Boulder, CO 80302

Interest Rate Report and Boulder County Homes Prices

Rates are up slightly but I expect rates to drop back into the mid to low 5’s in the not too distant future. I will elaborate on why later in this newsletter but I would like to initially discuss the President’s Emergency Economic Stimulus Package. President Bush signed the Stimulus package and as part of the package the Conforming Loan Limits will be increased to 125% of the median price for Boulder County. Based on the numbers provided thus far the number for Boulder will be $459,375. This number appears low but if you will recall on the last increase to $417,000 the number was adjusted upward after the initial release. HUD has 30 days to come up with the “official” amount for Boulder. I would assume that that means that the new limits will go into affect in 30 days. We have not heard any official word as to when we can start using the new limits. The impact on the increase will not be as large as we had hoped because we had hoped for a number in the vicinity of $623,000 - $723,000. What the number does mean is that a person buying a home for $575,000 and putting down 20% can get a conforming rate. I will keep you posted on any and all developments as they occur. A major reason for rates creeping up is that Warren Buffet has stepped in and offered a second level of insurance for municipal bonds. Buffet’s move has created a false sense of security for the troubled credit markets as the municipal bonds are the “low risk” bonds and not the mortgage related bonds. As one expert stated Buffet’s actions are like an ambulance coming to the scene of an accident and transporting the uninjured victims and leaving the injured at the scene to fend for themselves. The crisis in the credit markets is far from over and as Wall Street realizes this fact it will impact the mortgage markets further.